.
Feedback

Washington Township Health Care District Official Under Investigation

Board member Michael Wallace is also the board chairman of Fremont Bank, which has received more than $1 million from the district over the last decade.

A state political watchdog is investigating Washington Township Health Care District board member Michael Wallace to see if he violated conflict-of-interest laws, according to media reports.

The taxpayer-funded official is also a board member of Fremont Bank, where the health care district banks. Fremont Bank has received more than $1 million in fees from Washington Township, The Bay Citizen reports.

Wallace is now being investigated by the California Fair Political Practices Commission, which the agency announced publicly last week.

The local district, which operates in Fremont and serves Fremont, Newark, Union City and Sunol along with a southern portion of Hayward, is among more than 20 health care districts in California that have given millions of dollars in transactions to companies with ties to top district officials, according to a July report.

Board members of the Sequoia Healthcare District in Redwood City are also among those being probed.

According to The Bay Citizen, California is home to more than 70 health care districts that manage multi-million dollar budgets with little oversight. These districts often operate hospitals, manage properties and distribute grants.

Wallace came under the political watchdog’s radar because he has served on the Washington Township board since 1990. Since 2001, the district has paid more than $1.2 million in fees to Fremont Bank, where Wallace held various positions and is now the current board chairman.

Wallace held more than $1 million in stock of Fremont Bank’s parent company and had a salary of more than $100,000, The Bay Citizen reports.

Wallace told the nonprofit news organization that he did not participate in the board’s selection of Fremont Bank in 2001.

State conflict-of-interest laws, however, prohibit publicly funded agencies from entering into contracts that could benefit any of its members.

According to the Bay Citizen, the California Fair Political Practices Commission also looked into Washington Township Health Care System CEO Nancy Farber but decided not to continue with its investigation.

The Washington Township board approved two grants totaling $350,000 to the George Mark Children’s Home where Farber’s husband volunteered as an unpaid board member. Farber is not a board member and could not participate in the voting of the grants but was involved in a discussion about one of the two grants, according to The Bay Citizen.  

After the grants were awarded, Farber’s husband, Peter Farber-Szekrenyi, went on to become a paid consultant for the children’s home where he earned $12,800 a month and, later, its CEO, making more than $200,000 annually, according to The Bay Citizen.

Because Farber-Szekrenyi was a volunteer and not paid by the children’s home when the grants were approved, the state fair practices commission decided there was no conflict-of-interest.

Read the full Bay Citizen report here.

-----

Like Fremont Patch  | Follow Fremont Patch | Like Newark Patch  | Follow Newark Patch  | Like Union City Patch  | Follow Union City Patch 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Fremont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Nadja Adolf April 7, 2013 at 06:42 pm
Really? It isn't a private family matter? Then why was the Sheriff of SF County allowed to make thisRead More claim and plea bargain down so he could keep his guns?
Gregory Meredith April 1, 2013 at 05:35 pm
What if I went to my boss and told him he would now pay me 100% more? He would laugh and probablyRead More fire me. The truth is we have no choice but to pay this 100% increase. We are taxed to death in this country partially to pay for crap like this and now this?????? Your organization already receives 60 million$ a year of our money however we are still at your mercy when you decide to raise our rates by 100% furthermore yours is the only service that has no option to pay online without a outrageous service fee???? And you say we should be "glad" FUCK YOU!
Gregory Meredith April 1, 2013 at 05:26 pm
What a bunch of crap!
Edward January 25, 2013 at 04:11 am
Everybody is serviced with the water through these old pipes. No matter how much you use, if yourRead More water is interupted for weeks or months after a major earthquake, you home is rendered "UNLIVABLE". They could have raised your "TAX ASSESSMENT" each year just like Garbage and Yard Disposal but that would be unfair to the homes that are unoccupied or are rentals. The rental owner would just raise the rents to cover it but they ususally take a 200% bonus on the rent so the landloard can take a "piece of the Action". Once a Tax Assessment goes on your property tax, it never comes off. Remember, the Water is FREE...it is the service that gets it from the source to your kitchen sink or bath that costs money. Be Glad the Oil and Gas companies have not made your water unfit to drink in Amameda County....YET.